Furthermore, Carmen’s emotions are shown to us completely. Elation, doubt, confusion, suspicion… we’re not just told that Carmen is feeling them, we’re shown through her actions and her words. We’re even inside her head as she tries to puzzle out the actions of others – Jeremy and her mother for example. It’s a remarkable feat of prose.
I desperately wanted to read The Auschwitz Violin as soon as I saw the review posted by the Lit Addicted Brit. Months later I convinced my doting Father to buy me a copy on Christmas Eve, the annual day of buying-Hanna-whatever-she-wants-for-no-reason. It reminded me a little of The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas before I’d even opened it – it’s of a similar size and obviously there’s a similar topic. Truth be told though, The Auschwitz Violin can more than stand on its own feet and I’d be hard pressed to say which I enjoyed more.
In the winter of 1991, at a concert in Krakow, an older woman with a marvellously pitched violin meets a fellow musician who is instantly captivated by her instrument. When he asks her how she obtained it, she reveals the remarkable story behind its origin. . . .
Daniel is a talented luthier, but he is also an inmate at Auschwitz Concentration Camp in Poland. He has kept his true occupation a secret in order to avoid the gas showers, but when he offers to repair a broken instrument belonging to the Commander, he makes a mistake that may cost him his life.
Somehow, hearing the story of one individual can be more traumatising than being told the statistics of the estimated 1.1 million people that were slaughtered at the Auschwitz camps. I can’t take credit for that particular revelation – go thank The Lit Addicted Brit for the insight. When I read that review though, something just kind of clicked inside my head – it’s true. We’ve all heard the horrifying figures from our history lessons and TV documentaries, but we don’t really feel it until we’re told the story of one particular inmate, even if it is fictional. That’s why books like these are so important – they might not be 100% completely accurate, but they get the true feeling across more than any Wikipedia page ever could.
I liked Daniel but I couldn’t help but feel I should have connected to him more. Perhaps that’s more to do with the short length of the novel than any fault of the writing, but even so. That said, I respected him and his love for violins is palpable. It’s clear a lot of work has gone into researching craftmanship – each stroke of sandpaper and tightening of string is meticulously detailed, and it’s easy to get as drawn into to its creation as Daniel does.
He’s close to giving up hope and sometimes feels like the violin is the only reason he hasn’t given in to despair. I have an Irrational Hatred (so frequent it needs to be capitalised) for whiny characters even if they have every right in the world to complain. However, even despite my usual dislike, Daniel never bothered me. Not once. If that’s not a glowing recommendation, I don’t know what is. It’s just a very subtle book, I think. It doesn’t need to bludgeon you with the desperation because you can feel it slowly seep in around the edges and that’s much, much more effective.
The only thing that didn’t seem to make much sense were Daniel’s feelings towards the violin. I understand that its creation was possibly the only thing keeping him alive at that time, and yet I didn’t really believe that he would love it so much. Surely after going through such a horrendous ordeal, he’d never want to see the damn thing again, much less ensure that his family keep hold of it after he’s gone. Not a huge point, don’t get me wrong, but I didn’t think it was explained very well.
Interspersed between chapters are genuine documents from the time when Auschwitz was functioning. These detail punishments meted out to the inmates along with their living conditions and experiments performed. There’s just a few scattered in and amongst – not enough to overwhelm the story, but enough to cement your impression of its horrors and remind you that the story may be fictional, but the camp was not.
I enjoyed The Auschwitz Violin. It’s strange though – having finished it, I put it on the shelf and wandered off to do something else without feeling particularly moved or pensive. It does keep coming back to me though, and it’s nearly a week since I finished it. Parts of it will pop up in my head for no apparent reason and I can’t help but feel they’ll be haunting me for a while to come.
So this is my first entry for the What’s in a Name? challenge hosted by Beth Fish Reads. This is for the second category which is something you’d see in the sky and it’s also the sequel to Rivers of London. That review was a difficult one to write and this one is too – so hey, if you’ve any sympathy with the blood-from-a-stone type of trauma I’m going through here, run over and check out my new feature, Books My Boyfriend and I Have Argued About.
Body and soul—they’re also what Peter will risk as he investigates a pattern of similar deaths in and around Soho. With the help of his superior officer, Detective Chief Inspector Thomas Nightingale, the last registered wizard in England, and the assistance of beautiful jazz aficionado Simone Fitzwilliam, Peter will uncover a deadly magical menace—one that leads right to his own doorstep.
Emotion-wise, I wanted to give Peter Grant a good slap. There are two women he’s supposed to have feelings for, and apparently cares for them both. But not in an oh-aren’t-I-a-cad-hoho way and not with any feelings of guilt… he honestly just seems to somehow forget. It’s like the other one doesn’t exist at a particular time and it’s actually very, very irritating. There’s no confusion and the story follows Peter and still doesn’t even mention it. Gnargh. It bothered me in the first book (different women) but I didn’t mention it in my review in case I was being over-picky.
So hey, who wants to hear how well I’m doing in the TBR Challenge? You do? Well that’s just awesome. Funnily enough, I’m doing awesome too! In fact, The Mozart Conspiracy is my
fifth fourth (alright, so maybe not quite as awesome as I’d thought…) book this year that was on my TBR pile before 2012 and that’s nearly half. Go me and my overuse of italics!